⚖️ City Comparison

Bakersfield vs Bismarck

Cost of Living Comparison · 2026 Data

Bakersfield

California
101
Average
$310,000
Median Home
$1,200/mo
Median Rent
$57,548
Median Income

Bismarck

North Dakota
88
Below Average
$373,000
Median Home
$1,530/mo
Median Rent
$45,800
Median Income

💡 The Verdict

13% Cheaper

Bismarck is 13% cheaper than Bakersfield overall. A $75,000 salary in Bakersfield is equivalent to $65,347 in Bismarck.

Category-by-Category Breakdown

Index values for Bakersfield (left) vs Bismarck (right). National average = 100.

Housing
96
Housing
115
Groceries
100
Groceries
90
Utilities
106
Utilities
99
Transportation
109
Transportation
84
Healthcare
99
Healthcare
89

Detailed Price Comparison

Estimated item-level prices in Bakersfield versus Bismarck. Differences shown from Bakersfield perspective.

ItemBakersfieldBismarckDifference
1-Bed Rent$850/mo$1,110/mo$-260.00
2-Bed Rent$1,200/mo$1,530/mo$-330.00
3-Bed Rent$1,580/mo$2,070/mo$-490.00
Bread (loaf)$2.82$2.56+$0.26
Milk (gallon)$3.91$3.56+$0.35
Eggs (dozen)$2.86$3.12$-0.26
Coffee (latte)$5.76$5.43+$0.33
Gas (gallon)$3.43$3.17+$0.26
Restaurant Meal$17.52$12.99+$4.53

💰 Salary Equivalence

A $75,000 salary in Bakersfield has the same purchasing power as $65,347 in Bismarck.

Conversely, $75,000 in Bismarck equals $86,080 in Bakersfield.

💼 Take-Home Pay Comparison

Estimated annual take-home pay on a $75,000 salary after federal, FICA, and state income taxes.

$52,987
Bakersfield (California)
$56,212
Bismarck (North Dakota)

The $3225 difference is driven by California having a higher state income tax rate. California details → · North Dakota details →

⚙️ Customize Your Comparison

Adjust category weights to match your spending priorities.

35%
20%
15%
15%
15%
Your Weighted Score
101 vs 88

Reading These Numbers: Bakersfield (101) vs Bismarck (88)

Bakersfield at 101 is 1% above the US average, while Bismarck at 88 is 12% below average. There is a meaningful cost gap between these two cities that affects day-to-day budgeting.

In Bakersfield, the composite index of 101 reflects a weighted calculation where housing carries the most influence at 96, followed by groceries (100), utilities (106), transportation (109), and healthcare (99). Costs are fairly balanced across categories.

For renters: With median rents of $1,200/mo in Bakersfield and $1,530/mo in Bismarck, the annual rent difference is approximately $3,960.0. Over a 5-year period, that compounds to $19,800.0 in savings by choosing the more affordable city.

For homebuyers: The $63,000.0 difference in median home prices between Bakersfield and Bismarck translates to meaningful differences in mortgage payments at current rates. Factor this into your budget alongside property taxes and insurance, which also vary by location.

🔗 Related Tools

📚 Moving & Relocation Resources

Moving Planners →Finance Books →Budget Planners →

Amazon affiliate links

Making Your Decision: Bakersfield vs Bismarck

Choosing between Bakersfield and Bismarck involves more than just comparing index numbers. Consider how each category aligns with your personal spending patterns. If you work from home, transportation costs matter less than housing and utilities. If you eat out frequently, the groceries index may understate your actual food spending — look at the restaurant meal prices in the detailed comparison table above instead.

Long-term affordability in Bakersfield versus Bismarck depends partly on cost trajectory. Cities experiencing rapid population growth tend to see costs rise faster than established metros where supply has caught up with demand. While our index captures current conditions, consider whether the city trending cheaper today might converge toward average over the next five to ten years as more people discover it. Our quarterly updates help track these shifts over time.