⚖️ City Comparison

Aurora vs St. Paul

Cost of Living Comparison · 2026 Data

Aurora

Colorado
114
Above Average
$363,000
Median Home
$1,500/mo
Median Rent
$66,800
Median Income

St. Paul

Minnesota
100
Average
$260,000
Median Home
$1,300/mo
Median Rent
$57,718
Median Income

💡 The Verdict

12% Cheaper

St. Paul is 12% cheaper than Aurora overall. A $75,000 salary in Aurora is equivalent to $65,789 in St. Paul.

Category-by-Category Breakdown

Index values for Aurora (left) vs St. Paul (right). National average = 100.

Housing
115
Housing
98
Groceries
114
Groceries
103
Utilities
117
Utilities
97
Transportation
114
Transportation
108
Healthcare
125
Healthcare
105

Detailed Price Comparison

Estimated item-level prices in Aurora versus St. Paul. Differences shown from Aurora perspective.

ItemAuroraSt. PaulDifference
1-Bed Rent$1,070/mo$920/mo+$150.00
2-Bed Rent$1,500/mo$1,300/mo+$200.00
3-Bed Rent$2,060/mo$1,730/mo+$330.00
Bread (loaf)$3.13$2.45+$0.68
Milk (gallon)$4.45$4.27+$0.18
Eggs (dozen)$3.87$3.48+$0.39
Coffee (latte)$6.09$5.46+$0.63
Gas (gallon)$3.58$3.44+$0.14
Restaurant Meal$20.05$13.31+$6.74

💰 Salary Equivalence

A $75,000 salary in Aurora has the same purchasing power as $65,789 in St. Paul.

Conversely, $75,000 in St. Paul equals $85,500 in Aurora.

💼 Take-Home Pay Comparison

Estimated annual take-home pay on a $75,000 salary after federal, FICA, and state income taxes.

$54,337
Aurora (Colorado)
$52,537
St. Paul (Minnesota)

The $1800 difference is driven by Minnesota having a higher state income tax rate. Colorado details → · Minnesota details →

⚙️ Customize Your Comparison

Adjust category weights to match your spending priorities.

35%
20%
15%
15%
15%
Your Weighted Score
114 vs 100

Reading These Numbers: Aurora (114) vs St. Paul (100)

Aurora at 114 is 14% above the US average, while St. Paul at 100 is 0% below average. There is a meaningful cost gap between these two cities that affects day-to-day budgeting.

In Aurora, the composite index of 114 reflects a weighted calculation where housing carries the most influence at 115, followed by groceries (114), utilities (117), transportation (114), and healthcare (125). Costs are fairly balanced across categories.

For renters: With median rents of $1,500/mo in Aurora and $1,300/mo in St. Paul, the annual rent difference is approximately $2,400.0. Over a 5-year period, that compounds to $12,000.0 in savings by choosing the more affordable city.

For homebuyers: The $103,000.0 difference in median home prices between Aurora and St. Paul translates to meaningful differences in mortgage payments at current rates. Factor this into your budget alongside property taxes and insurance, which also vary by location.

🔗 Related Tools

📚 Moving & Relocation Resources

Moving Planners →Finance Books →Budget Planners →

Amazon affiliate links

Making Your Decision: Aurora vs St. Paul

Choosing between Aurora and St. Paul involves more than just comparing index numbers. Consider how each category aligns with your personal spending patterns. If you work from home, transportation costs matter less than housing and utilities. If you eat out frequently, the groceries index may understate your actual food spending — look at the restaurant meal prices in the detailed comparison table above instead.

When weighing Aurora against St. Paul, think beyond the composite index. Your personal savings rate, retirement timeline, and family size all influence which cost categories dominate your budget. Someone spending sixty percent of income on housing and childcare will experience these two cities very differently than a single renter whose largest variable expense is dining out. Model your own spending breakdown against the category indices above for the most realistic comparison.