⚖️ City Comparison

Aurora vs San Francisco

Cost of Living Comparison · 2026 Data

Aurora

Colorado
114
Above Average
$363,000
Median Home
$1,500/mo
Median Rent
$66,800
Median Income

San Francisco

California
190
Extremely Expensive
$1,200,000
Median Home
$3,400/mo
Median Rent
$119,136
Median Income

💡 The Verdict

40% Cheaper

Aurora is 40% cheaper than San Francisco overall. A $75,000 salary in Aurora is equivalent to $125,000 in San Francisco.

Category-by-Category Breakdown

Index values for Aurora (left) vs San Francisco (right). National average = 100.

Housing
115
Housing
327
Groceries
114
Groceries
112
Utilities
117
Utilities
126
Transportation
114
Transportation
113
Healthcare
125
Healthcare
113

Detailed Price Comparison

Estimated item-level prices in Aurora versus San Francisco. Differences shown from Aurora perspective.

ItemAuroraSan FranciscoDifference
1-Bed Rent$1,070/mo$2,370/mo$-1300.00
2-Bed Rent$1,500/mo$3,400/mo$-1900.00
3-Bed Rent$2,060/mo$4,530/mo$-2470.00
Bread (loaf)$3.13$3.13$0.00
Milk (gallon)$4.45$4.60$-0.15
Eggs (dozen)$3.87$3.50+$0.37
Coffee (latte)$6.09$6.26$-0.17
Gas (gallon)$3.58$3.66$-0.08
Restaurant Meal$20.05$26.09$-6.04

💰 Salary Equivalence

A $75,000 salary in Aurora has the same purchasing power as $125,000 in San Francisco.

Conversely, $75,000 in San Francisco equals $45,000 in Aurora.

💼 Take-Home Pay Comparison

Estimated annual take-home pay on a $75,000 salary after federal, FICA, and state income taxes.

$54,337
Aurora (Colorado)
$52,987
San Francisco (California)

The $1350 difference is driven by California having a higher state income tax rate. Colorado details → · California details →

⚙️ Customize Your Comparison

Adjust category weights to match your spending priorities.

35%
20%
15%
15%
15%
Your Weighted Score
114 vs 190

Reading These Numbers: Aurora (114) vs San Francisco (190)

Aurora at 114 is 14% above the US average, while San Francisco at 190 is 90% above average. There is a meaningful cost gap between these two cities that affects day-to-day budgeting.

In Aurora, the composite index of 114 reflects a weighted calculation where housing carries the most influence at 115, followed by groceries (114), utilities (117), transportation (114), and healthcare (125). Costs are fairly balanced across categories.

For renters: With median rents of $1,500/mo in Aurora and $3,400/mo in San Francisco, the annual rent difference is approximately $22,800.0. Over a 5-year period, that compounds to $114,000.0 in savings by choosing the more affordable city.

For homebuyers: The $837,000.0 difference in median home prices between Aurora and San Francisco translates to meaningful differences in mortgage payments at current rates. Factor this into your budget alongside property taxes and insurance, which also vary by location.

🔗 Related Tools

📚 Moving & Relocation Resources

Moving Planners →Finance Books →Budget Planners →

Amazon affiliate links

Making Your Decision: Aurora vs San Francisco

Choosing between Aurora and San Francisco involves more than just comparing index numbers. Consider how each category aligns with your personal spending patterns. If you work from home, transportation costs matter less than housing and utilities. If you eat out frequently, the groceries index may understate your actual food spending — look at the restaurant meal prices in the detailed comparison table above instead.

The cost gap between Aurora and San Francisco reflects thousands of individual pricing differences across housing markets, grocery chains, utility providers, and healthcare networks. No two households experience the same effective cost of living even in the same city, which is why the category breakdown matters more than the headline number. Adjust the lifestyle weighting sliders above to see how your spending priorities shift the comparison between these specific metros.