⚖️ City Comparison

Aurora vs Bismarck

Cost of Living Comparison · 2026 Data

Aurora

Colorado
114
Above Average
$363,000
Median Home
$1,500/mo
Median Rent
$66,800
Median Income

Bismarck

North Dakota
88
Below Average
$373,000
Median Home
$1,530/mo
Median Rent
$45,800
Median Income

💡 The Verdict

23% Cheaper

Bismarck is 23% cheaper than Aurora overall. A $75,000 salary in Aurora is equivalent to $57,895 in Bismarck.

Category-by-Category Breakdown

Index values for Aurora (left) vs Bismarck (right). National average = 100.

Housing
115
Housing
115
Groceries
114
Groceries
90
Utilities
117
Utilities
99
Transportation
114
Transportation
84
Healthcare
125
Healthcare
89

Detailed Price Comparison

Estimated item-level prices in Aurora versus Bismarck. Differences shown from Aurora perspective.

ItemAuroraBismarckDifference
1-Bed Rent$1,070/mo$1,110/mo$-40.00
2-Bed Rent$1,500/mo$1,530/mo$-30.00
3-Bed Rent$2,060/mo$2,070/mo$-10.00
Bread (loaf)$3.13$2.56+$0.57
Milk (gallon)$4.45$3.56+$0.89
Eggs (dozen)$3.87$3.12+$0.75
Coffee (latte)$6.09$5.43+$0.66
Gas (gallon)$3.58$3.17+$0.41
Restaurant Meal$20.05$12.99+$7.06

💰 Salary Equivalence

A $75,000 salary in Aurora has the same purchasing power as $57,895 in Bismarck.

Conversely, $75,000 in Bismarck equals $97,159 in Aurora.

💼 Take-Home Pay Comparison

Estimated annual take-home pay on a $75,000 salary after federal, FICA, and state income taxes.

$54,337
Aurora (Colorado)
$56,212
Bismarck (North Dakota)

The $1875 difference is driven by Colorado having a higher state income tax rate. Colorado details → · North Dakota details →

⚙️ Customize Your Comparison

Adjust category weights to match your spending priorities.

35%
20%
15%
15%
15%
Your Weighted Score
114 vs 88

Reading These Numbers: Aurora (114) vs Bismarck (88)

Aurora at 114 is 14% above the US average, while Bismarck at 88 is 12% below average. There is a meaningful cost gap between these two cities that affects day-to-day budgeting.

In Aurora, the composite index of 114 reflects a weighted calculation where housing carries the most influence at 115, followed by groceries (114), utilities (117), transportation (114), and healthcare (125). Costs are fairly balanced across categories.

For renters: With median rents of $1,500/mo in Aurora and $1,530/mo in Bismarck, the annual rent difference is approximately $360.0. Over a 5-year period, that compounds to $1,800.0 in savings by choosing the more affordable city.

For homebuyers: The $10,000.0 difference in median home prices between Aurora and Bismarck translates to meaningful differences in mortgage payments at current rates. Factor this into your budget alongside property taxes and insurance, which also vary by location.

🔗 Related Tools

📚 Moving & Relocation Resources

Moving Planners →Finance Books →Budget Planners →

Amazon affiliate links

Making Your Decision: Aurora vs Bismarck

Choosing between Aurora and Bismarck involves more than just comparing index numbers. Consider how each category aligns with your personal spending patterns. If you work from home, transportation costs matter less than housing and utilities. If you eat out frequently, the groceries index may understate your actual food spending — look at the restaurant meal prices in the detailed comparison table above instead.

The cost gap between Aurora and Bismarck reflects thousands of individual pricing differences across housing markets, grocery chains, utility providers, and healthcare networks. No two households experience the same effective cost of living even in the same city, which is why the category breakdown matters more than the headline number. Adjust the lifestyle weighting sliders above to see how your spending priorities shift the comparison between these specific metros.