๐Ÿ“Š Cost of Living Comparison

Anchorage vs Missoula

Side-by-side cost of living comparison for 2026

Anchorage

Alaska
127
Expensive
$340,000
Median Home
$1,400/mo
Median Rent
$72,515
Median Income

Missoula

Montana
115
Above Average
$460,000
Median Home
$1,400/mo
Median Rent
$49,234
Median Income

๐Ÿ’ก The Verdict

9% cheaper
Missoula is 9% more affordable than Anchorage. A $75,000 salary in Anchorage is equivalent to $67,913 in Missoula.

Category-by-Category Breakdown

Index values shown. National average = 100. Lower is cheaper.

Housing
142
Anchorage
141
Missoula
Groceries
120
Anchorage
103
Missoula
Utilities
130
Anchorage
89
Missoula
Transportation
108
Anchorage
101
Missoula
Healthcare
128
Anchorage
102
Missoula

๐Ÿ’ฐ Salary Equivalence

To maintain the same standard of living:

$67,913
$75K in Anchorage โ†’ Missoula
$82,826
$75K in Missoula โ†’ Anchorage

See exact take-home pay: Alaska salaries ยท Montana salaries

Living in Anchorage vs Missoula

Housing is typically the biggest factor in any cost-of-living comparison. Anchorage has a housing index of 142 while Missoula sits at 141 (national average = 100). The median home in Anchorage costs $340,000 compared to $460,000 in Missoula, a difference of $120,000. Monthly rent follows a similar pattern: $1,400 in Anchorage versus $1,400 in Missoula.

Groceries and everyday expenses show a notable difference: Anchorage scores 120 while Missoula scores 103.

Healthcare costs in Anchorage (128) are higher than Missoula (102).

Median household income in Anchorage is $72,515 compared to $49,234 in Missoula. When adjusted for cost of living, income goes further in Missoula.

๐Ÿ”— Related Tools

๐Ÿ“š Moving & Relocation Resources

Moving Planners โ†’Finance Books โ†’Budget Planners โ†’

Amazon affiliate links